Michael Jackson death a murder?

Discussion in 'Water Cooler' started by kev, Jul 15, 2009.

  1. kev

    kev Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    61
    Rumors are going around that the Michael Jackson death was a murder. I wonder if it was "really" a murder, of if some doctor just gave him too many prescriptions. With no intentions of michael dieing.
     
  2. John

    John Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    87
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Always when an celebrity have died there is rumours that it was an murder an not accident.
     
  3. Ben

    Ben Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    1
    No, he died of an overdose. End of story.
     
  4. Randy

    Randy Adept

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    8
    First Name:
    Randy
    Its suicide, overdose of drugs ;D

    we had a debate in my class about this, i won with my suicide story
     
  5. Cole

    Cole Addict

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    First Name:
    Cole
    I would say that it is reasonable to suggest that we will see some potential manslaughter cases filed against whomever prescribed Jackson the different drugs.

    As far as actual murder goes. It is not unreasonable to suggest that he was not maliciously taken, albeit it is unlikely. The temporary Jackson mansion was not sealed off after the death. The LAPD has a track record of being unbelievably incompetent--and this HUGE mistake could cost getting to the bottom of the entire story.

    Overall, I think that it would be fair for whomever prescribed Jackson those different prescriptions to lose his medical license and go to jail for manslaughter charges. I am sorry, but giving an addict something as dangerous as what Jackson was addicted to is worthy of jail time in my eyes.
     
  6. 3Phase

    3Phase Champion

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    44
    yeahthat right down the line

    IMO - Everyone who enabled, aided, abetted his self-medication knew this might happen, even knew they could be in a lot of legal trouble if it did. They took the risk for financial rewards - they sold their ethics.

    Because MJ was a past master at manipulating others to get his way using $$$$. This manipulation defined his life. Including the birth of 3 children he has legal rights over, as well as the drugs and everything else about his lifestyle. He found people, doctors, staff who could be bought and he owned them.

    Personally I believe that MJ's death was either an outright suicide or an act of personal carelessness so profound as to be the same thing. Nonetheless the accountability for making it possible could well lead to serious legal consequences for the enablers. MJ may have the greatest responsibility for his own death, but surely those who sold their ethics, drugs and skills to make it possible should not be practicing, might deserve jail.

    Why would MJ take his life or be so knowingly careless with it as to make its loss highly likely, even inevitable? Considering his beloved children and so on ... This is strictly speculative, strictly IMO. MJ could justifiably have felt he was reaching the end of the path in all aspects of his life. He was inflexible to changing himself to adapt to a situation changing over time - he didn't adapt to things, he made things adapt to him. He used isolation to manipulate his children as if they were pets, but the oldest are rapidly reaching an age where that level of control will be impossible, and conflicts would have been profound. He no longer had access to other children without risking almost certain jail, something he could not have endured (partly because he doesn't adapt.) Financially he could not stop spending his considerable assets into oblivion - even to the jeopardy of his children's inheritance. Professionally he was contractually committed to a show schedule he couldn't physically meet. That tour was always doomed to failure - and of course, tabloid excoriation. And so on and on ... He could have managed his life by making changes, but it doesn't sound like he wanted to live any other way. Not even for his children. Their lives were about his life, not the other way around.

    That's my speculation.
     

Share This Page