Litespeed vs Apache

Discussion in 'Domains, Hosting and Servers' started by gnatster, Jan 11, 2010.

  1. gnatster

    gnatster Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    98
    Location:
    Down the hall
    First Name:
    Nathan
    I have a unique opportunity to move my site to it's own box. Doesn't really need it yet but this is one of those can't pass up deals.

    They are offering me Litespeed instead of Apache if I desire.

    Do I desire?

    Why?
     
  2. 2dub

    2dub Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Moyock, NC
    My new host offers Lightspeed and I asked the same question. It works to make static pages load up to 7 times faster and PHP load 50% faster. ANd I have to tell you I believe it. My site has never loaded so fast. BTW I use Hawkhost and couldn't be happier it is the best of the past 3 hosts I've had.
     
  3. MjrNuT

    MjrNuT Grand Master

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    579
    Likes Received:
    36
    Agreed w/ 2dub. My host is Litespeed. MDDhosting.com
     
  4. Abomination

    Abomination Zealot

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,514
    Likes Received:
    102
    I almost paid 2x to get an account with litespeed over apache, which had far less features.

    Urljet has light speed
    ServINT has apache
     
  5. kaambiz

    kaambiz Novice

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    6
    First Name:
    kaambiz
    Litespeed without a doubt. been using it for two years.
     
  6. MordyT

    MordyT Grand Master

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    50
    First Name:
    Mordy
    Anyone here ever used nginx and how does it compare to litespeed?
     
  7. shamil

    shamil Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    1
    Litespeed is very good, and certainly handles things better than Apache in many respects, however, I would like to see more benchmarks and stats between very recent versions of Apache, lighttpd, LiteSpeed, nginx :)
     
  8. tech

    tech Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    11
    Im torn between hostmonster and Hawkhost, EDIT: Ive chosen HawkHost now =)
     
  9. Vekseid

    Vekseid Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    13
    Never bothered with Litespeed. nginx runs circles around pretty much everything. It is multiple orders of magnitude faster and more efficient than Apache, and not having Apache manage fastcgi is always a plus.
     
  10. 2dub

    2dub Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Moyock, NC
    I think you'll like them. Great service, fast, and great prices.
     
  11. Nick

    Nick Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    7,441
    Likes Received:
    218
    One of my sites runs on a Litespeed server. No qualms. :)
     
  12. gnatster

    gnatster Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    98
    Location:
    Down the hall
    First Name:
    Nathan
    Decision made, going with Litespeed and moving the site this coming weekend.
     
  13. mripguru

    mripguru Newcomer

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    2
    First Name:
    Jonathan
    LiteSpeed > Apache any day of the week.
     
  14. carolynccourtney

    carolynccourtney Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    First Name:
    carolyn
    This is interesting, although I have curious if anyone has a site / server busy enough for the test. Urine even then a lot of visitors to the site when the site goes down for the pumping of web servers, except for apache -> litespeed.
    Maybe get a host that is willing to change its highly optimized apache + worker in a busy server with litespeed then compare the difference in resources?
     
  15. SolidShellSecur

    SolidShellSecur Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    2
    LiteSpeed is really overrated. You can reach same with nginx or another free service.
     
  16. PK-Host

    PK-Host Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    England
    First Name:
    Pete
    Litespeed, Nginx and any other webserver/webserver addon. In my personal opinion should a host require the the use of one of these I would recommend that you ask for some stats of their server, generally Apache should be able to cope with a lot of traffic to a server.

    A reason a lot of hosts move to utilise these other webservers is to try run more websites on servers that dont have the required specifications to run that amount. I have always used Apache and with its latest release increasing the speed of apache I don't think I would move any time soon.
     
  17. sng

    sng Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    1
    I agree with you, I am using Varnish with Apache and the load time is just as fast as a server with litespeed. We ran a few test, and came to a conclusion that Litespeed is not worth paying an extra $600 per license.
     

Share This Page