There are many different tools for figuring out your site's traffic and such. How do you figure out which site's report is more accurate?
Well I have no idea which is most accurate, but I'd say I trust Google. Only because you would naturally *expect* their products to be the top-of-the-line. I haven't come across any accuracy studies or anything of the like, but I just invest my trust in Google Analytics. I do often check my rankings with other tools though, because some offer different and unique stats, so it's nice to get a general idea of what's going on.
I agree; I do find Google to be more accurate. Though, Alexa is also quite known. To be honest, I try to follow the trend.
But Alexa is skewed; their results are calculated based on users who visit your site that have the Alexa toolbar installed. Therefore, a site that is targeted to an older demographic won't rank high in Alexa, even if it is a very popular and frequently-visited site. Most elders don't have "extras" like the Alexa toolbar installed.
Very true, valid point indeed. I also learned something new, I was not aware that you had to have the toolbar installed.
I used to rely on Awstats, but currently it only shows a 500-error and my host still hasn't fixed it. Other stats I use, are the common Google applications like Analytics.
Alexa is spyware. Every time you mention the alexa name, your promoting spyware. And the last time I heard, spyware was a bad thing. There are 2 tools that I use to keep an eye on my traffic - Google Analytics and yahoo blog log.
Alexa is spyware? Since when and where did you hear that? Yahoo Blog Log is also great for blog powered sites.
I'm starting a blog before the end of the month. Should I continue to use Google analytics as I have been with my forums or use this Yahoo blog log? Suggestions?
No it is not. That is probably one of the more laughable things I have heard. :lol: Why would you move away from something you are familiar with and something that you know works?
Oh good! Man, I knew I could not have been that dumb. But if others are saying Windows identifies it as a trojan, than, it may be.